<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ecclesiology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremyduncan.ca/ecclesiology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremyduncan.ca/ecclesiology?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ecclesiology</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://jeremyduncan.ca/ecclesiology/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyduncan.ca/?p=2#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Once again, I would suggest that our ecclesiology is not evolving. Our methods do, but the Church&#039;s identity, as defined by Jesus, Paul and the early believers needs to remain fixed if we want to stay rooted to the ancient Christian tradition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, I would suggest that our ecclesiology is not evolving. Our methods do, but the Church&#8217;s identity, as defined by Jesus, Paul and the early believers needs to remain fixed if we want to stay rooted to the ancient Christian tradition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://jeremyduncan.ca/ecclesiology/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyduncan.ca/?p=2#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Vaild criticism, but I feel like the risk is worth the reward. In our quest to manage all risk we have taken any sense of exploration away from the church. Somewhere there must be a better balance than what we have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaild criticism, but I feel like the risk is worth the reward. In our quest to manage all risk we have taken any sense of exploration away from the church. Somewhere there must be a better balance than what we have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Colquhoun</title>
		<link>http://jeremyduncan.ca/ecclesiology/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Colquhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyduncan.ca/?p=2#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I like it.
In retaliation against what we hate the most in something we love the most we could end up creating something even worse without being grounded.  Good thoughts Jeremy, the site is looking real good too!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.<br />
In retaliation against what we hate the most in something we love the most we could end up creating something even worse without being grounded.  Good thoughts Jeremy, the site is looking real good too!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://jeremyduncan.ca/ecclesiology/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 07:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyduncan.ca/?p=2#comment-2</guid>
		<description>you have very intelligent friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have very intelligent friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

