Comments on: New Lens II

By: jeremy

jeremy — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:45:40 +0000

I haven’t had a chance to shoot with it a whole lot. I tend to keep my 18-200 VR lens on my camera most of the time. I bought this one mainly for low light situations.

Hopefully I’ll get a chance to really test out in the next couple weeks.

By: kyle

kyle — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:06:43 +0000

That lens is ridiculous. So how does she perform?

By: jeremy

jeremy — Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:59:21 +0000

Seriously take a look at this Sigma with an actual person in the shot: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/images/pma07/IMG_8063-sigma.jpg
It weighs 88lbs for godsake.

By: jeremy

jeremy — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:59:48 +0000

Sometimes you just get lucky. Now I just need a good deal on a D200.

By: kyle

kyle — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:37:12 +0000

You need to let us know how you get these ridiculous deals I hear about.

By: jeremy

jeremy — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:29:23 +0000

Perhaps he does. Although I certainly did get a smokin deal on this baby I have to questions the timing of Jesus’ supernatural savings radar. It would have been much more convenient had he found me this deal prior to my prime purchase.

By: kyle

kyle — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:39:05 +0000

Jeeeeesus. Er. Saves?

By: jeremy

jeremy — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:19:35 +0000

If you think that thing is big take a look at this http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030805sigma200500mm.asp don’t worry the image is safe for work.

By: jae

jae — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:49:50 +0000

this lens is unreasonably large…
one might think you were overcompensating…

By: jeremy

jeremy — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:46:42 +0000

I’ll let you know. I got the prime pretty cheap so if the Sigma is decent I may be convinced to part fairly easily.

By: kyle

kyle — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:44:02 +0000

Depending on the price I may be interested in your 28 prime if you decide to get rid of it.